“In Chick Lit,” writes Laura
Fraser, “women write about their emotions. In Dude Lit, men use rock ‘n’ roll
songs as a stand-in for their feelings. The more complex the emotions, the more
obscure the band.”
I know, I know, I get sick of
beating the gender drum too. But Ron
Carlson’s Five Skies has such a male
quality to it that I can’t help but begin with gender. And as you’ll see by the time I finish, it’s
clear that he’s doing an interesting blend of “dude lit” and “chick lit” that
ends up blurring labels the way all good books do.
Ron Carlson’s Five Skies does not follow the dude lit
mold Fraser describes above. Instead of
using rock songs as emotional stand-ins, Carlson has created a book that
recognizes how difficult it is for men to deal with emotions, even though the
emotions are present and the men have a very real desire to deal with them. The book operates on premise more than plot:
three men work on a construction project in Idaho . They do not
previously know one another, but the two leads, Arthur Key and Darwin, are both
freshly grieving personal tragedies. The
third man—who, at twenty, is just breaking into manhood—is troubled by his own
ignominious history. For me, the book
was strongest
in the scenes between Key and Darwin where their conversation edges towards expressing their grief, then tantalizingly backs away. Sometimes the conversation would avoid emotions entirely on its surface but remain somehow deeply fraught.
in the scenes between Key and Darwin where their conversation edges towards expressing their grief, then tantalizingly backs away. Sometimes the conversation would avoid emotions entirely on its surface but remain somehow deeply fraught.
Five Skies is the
first novel I read in preparation for the Squaw Valley Writers Workshop, where
Carlson is on the faculty. Why Five Skies? I’ve been meaning to read it for some years
now because I liked how different the premise and the setting are from the
books I typically read, while the meat of the book isn’t a far cry from the
domestic fiction I tend to favor. I wasn’t disappointed in this respect. The book captures the everyday interactions
of these men and the real feelings behind them, even as it details welding,
planting poles, and other activities far outside the drawing room sphere (and
when I say drawing room here, I mean parlor and nothing related to construction
blueprints). In short, the flavor of the
lifestyle and the vast western landscape remains unmistakably male while the
conflict and drama of the book is along the lines of what we would consider
“female” or “domestic”—small interactions and what they mean.
I can’t blog about Five Skies without calling attention to
one other remarkable feature: the pacing of the book. As we all know, our society loves instant
gratification, and to the novelist’s chagrin, this love has ramifications for
fiction—an expectation that the novel will move in a way that “hooks” the
reader, that keeps the ever-dwindling attention span satisfied. Five
Skies refuses to do any such thing.
It demands its own pace from the nature-filled description of what it’s
like for Arthur Key to wake up in chapter 1 to his very deliberate movements in
the final chapter (I won’t give it away).
I’ll be honest: it is a slow pace, and if you’re a reader for whom slow
pace is a deal breaker, Five Skies probably
isn’t for you. To my mind, slow pace is
not necessarily a bad thing and can, in fact, be a great thing, a wonderful
antidote to our 10 Mbps world. Slow
pacing is painful when it is born of bogged down, pointless description or a
bunch of information about characters that lacks particular insight. But when a slow pace is part of the
intentional flavor of a book and sets the kind of contemplative stage necessary
for—oh, say—characters slowly healing from grief, it becomes part of the
novel’s art. It’s just too bad for those
of us writers who don’t yet have name recognition that we often can’t get away
with it. Kudos to Carlson for cashing in
on his hard-earned reputation.
No comments:
Post a Comment